Tag: media self regulation

What you need to know about the Supreme Court’s abortion decision

The Supreme Court is set to take up abortion on Friday.

But first, a quick reminder about the case, which involves the constitutional right to abortion.

The case will be heard by a three-judge panel.

Here’s everything you need know.

Abortion cases: What to know The case is being heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

That’s a four-judges panel, which means it will be up to the judges to decide the case’s constitutionality, which is not up to them.

It will likely go to the Supreme Judicial Court, the country’s highest court.

If they rule that the Constitution grants an individual the right to an abortion, the Supreme Courts would then decide the constitutionality of that right.

What the Supreme says The case centers on the legality of a state law that allows for abortions at the point of fetal viability.

A court ruling on the constitutionally protected right to have an abortion has been the subject of much debate, with some legal experts saying that if the Supreme court rules in favor of the law, that would mean that it is constitutional.

“That’s the first step,” said Mark Glaze, a professor of law at Georgetown University Law Center.

“The question is whether the court agrees with that decision, and if so, what it would say.”

If the court disagrees with the court’s ruling, it will decide whether the law is constitutional, which could take years to settle.

But that’s the tricky part of this case.

The justices will have to decide whether a court ruling that allows abortion would apply equally to other constitutional rights.

“A case can only be heard once a term has expired,” said Glaze.

“So if they rule in favor, it would apply to other constitutionally protected rights, and they would have to answer for that.”

The abortion issue in the U

Social media firms face scrutiny over ‘secretive’ surveillance of US citizens

The heads of social media giants Facebook, Twitter and Google have joined an administration review of how their companies handle the surveillance of their users, amid growing concern over a new law that would allow government agencies to share information about users’ activities with each other.

The review, which was first reported by the Wall Street Journal, could lead to more transparency and oversight of government agencies that oversee the platforms.

“The public deserves to know how government agencies are using technology to collect and store data,” Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said in a statement.

The law would require companies like Facebook, which has about 2.7 billion monthly active users worldwide, to disclose data about users to government officials.

It also would require the companies to publish information about their usage of data analytics tools, such as facial recognition, to the government.

In a statement Thursday, Facebook said it would release information about data it collects to the NSA and other federal agencies in coming weeks, and would “continue to work closely with lawmakers and the White House to make sure that all information collected by the government is used appropriately and in a manner that protects civil liberties and civil liberties.”

Facebook said in January that it had been the target of a massive surveillance program by the National Security Agency, which uses facial recognition technology to scan people’s faces and then uses that information to identify the people who visit their pages.

Facebook is also a frequent target of government surveillance because of how the social media platform operates.

Wyden and other critics of the NSA have called for Facebook to turn over the location data collected by NSA programs.

Facebook, Google and other tech companies said the government’s request for that data violated their privacy commitments.

“I believe we need to know exactly how our data is being used, and I believe we can only do that if we know who has access to the data and how the information is being shared,” said Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg.

Facebook said Thursday that it has not received any requests for data.

Sandberg said in her statement that the company “will continue to work with lawmakers on this issue, and we look forward to working with the White Houses on these issues.”

Twitter also said it has no plans to disclose any of its users’ data to the federal government.

“We will continue to be open to discussing our practices with lawmakers, and the American people, about what is in our data and why we collect it,” Twitter’s chief privacy officer, John Sullivan, said in an emailed statement.

Facebook declined to say whether it had shared users’ location data with the NSA.

In February, Facebook and Twitter revealed that they had been tracking the location of a user from their own devices and sharing that data with other companies, including the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, or NGA.

Facebook has been under scrutiny for not disclosing the information to the public.

Twitter has also been under investigation by the Justice Department for not sharing users’ private data with law enforcement agencies.

NFL’s self-conscious expectations for social media and media self regulation

The NFL is taking a page out of the Twitter playbook and trying to self-regulate its social media presence with a new rule to help prevent fans from venting on the platform.

The league announced Wednesday it is taking steps to help fans feel more secure on social media by requiring fans to create a profile and posting a link to it in their feed to prevent tweets from becoming a distraction for their team.

The rule, called “self-consumption,” is meant to give fans an alternative to going to Twitter to vent.

Fans will need to create their own profile and link to the post.

The NFL also plans to require that fans post their tweets to a page in their feeds, which will be updated by Twitter every time a tweet is posted.

The idea is that fans can now keep a record of the tweets they have posted, and it will be easy for them to track how many people have tweeted at them, according to league officials.

The new rules are part of a broader effort by the league to increase self-awareness on social issues, especially around the use of social media platforms.

The league has been experimenting with different ways to help its fans better understand what they are talking about on social platforms and whether they are contributing to the debate.

Some teams have implemented their own tools that allow fans to monitor what they say and what they do on social-media platforms.

But the league has not done the same thing for fans.

The new rule would require fans to post their posts in their own feed to help them keep a track of the conversations.

The goal is to have a more accurate, balanced picture of what the conversation is about, said NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy.

In a recent report by the Associated Press, the league said it is looking to develop an automated tool that would allow fans who do not have an account to log into the league’s social media account to monitor how the league and other teams are communicating.

“It’s a great example of a tool that can help us communicate more effectively and better understand the way we communicate with our fans,” McCarthy said.

“We have a lot of tools that we use to communicate with fans that are a bit more manual.”

The rule was announced during a meeting of the NFL Players Association, the union that represents players and has been in talks with the league about how to implement its own rulebook.

The union said it was also looking to implement a new social media filter that would help ensure fans are not getting “a little too close to the line.”

“We know that social media is a great way to express yourself, but it also brings out a lot more personal information,” said Brett Favre, the NFL’s All-Pro quarterback and an owner of the Minnesota Vikings.

“There is a lot to talk about when it comes to social media that you don’t want to get too close or get into.”

Follow The Associated Press sports news at https://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/nba-self-censors-twitter-users-self regulation.html and https://sports.usatalk.com/?news=news-us-soccer.article#storylink=sports.news The Associated Journal is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial and political news and commentary.

Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.

Its news coverage may be partially or wholly funded by the sponsors of USA NOW.