Tag: self-sharing social media

How to stop the self-censorship from coming to your social media account

It’s a well-known truism among social media users that if you share something publicly on your platform, you’re doing so with the express intention of letting other people know you were there.

But the reality is, your public Facebook posts and tweets are often filled with little more than a self-serving desire to attract attention and a handful of clicks.

The idea of “self-serving” is not a new one.

It’s something that has been with us since the dawn of the internet, and while it may not be the main reason why you see a lot of posts on Facebook or Twitter that are in no way related to your content, the fact that you’ve shared them in the first place makes them seem like the obvious answer.

The most important lesson here is that sharing something publicly doesn’t mean you’re giving it away.

The more important reason to keep your content private is that it’s a way to avoid the consequences of sharing things that you know are bad.

It may not have been as prevalent in the digital age as it is today, but it’s still very much in vogue.

It goes without saying that sharing your thoughts or opinions with the world is one of the most powerful ways to reach your audience, and it’s why many social media platforms have begun to create “shared content” policies that specifically prohibit posting opinions or thoughts that may be harmful to others.

And when it comes to your Facebook or YouTube account, the best way to keep yourself and your friends safe is to not share anything at all.

To learn more about the self censorship on social media that we mentioned above, we asked the experts at MTV News to share the top five reasons why you shouldn’t post anything at any time, and the top 5 best ways to avoid self-censor on social platforms.

1.

Self-censoring is a good thing.

This is one reason why sharing anything publicly on social channels isn’t a good idea.

It could mean that your friends are getting their news from the wrong sources, and that you don’t want to be seen as a spoiler.

If it’s about a controversial topic, like abortion, it’s best to avoid sharing it on social.

But even if you do want to share something on social, it is still a good choice to avoid making any direct comments about abortion, abortion providers, or abortion related topics.

And if you don, it could be a real turnoff to your followers.

Instead, consider sharing something that’s important to you and is in line with your personal beliefs or values.

For instance, share your favorite recipes or your favorite songs or albums.

These things are often important to people in your life and are more likely to make you feel more comfortable sharing your own personal thoughts and opinions.

It can also be a way for you to show your friends that you care about them and are willing to listen.

This doesn’t necessarily mean you should share every thing you like about a topic, but you can at least show that you’re open to listening to their point of view.

2.

You can be a good role model for other people.

Sharing something publicly is only one way to make yourself feel important.

You’re a social influencer and it can be hard to feel like you’re truly appreciated for sharing something.

But if you want to make people want to see you, show that they can be inspired by you.

You could also share a funny photo of yourself and make a funny comment about yourself.

The only problem with this is that the other person might not think it’s funny, but if they do, they could potentially make you look less like a role model to your peers.

You might even get a little laugh from it. 3.

Your posts are about you.

If you’re sharing something on your social channels that has nothing to do with you, but is about you, you might be making a big mistake.

This might be true if you’re trying to help a friend with an illness, or your business interests.

But there’s a good chance that the topic is unrelated to you, so sharing it publicly will just make you seem more like a troll than someone who genuinely cares about their audience.

If your posts are simply for fun, or for your own enjoyment, you can usually avoid this, but sharing something with your audience that’s really important to them could make them feel more like you.

4.

You don’t need to be a social media expert to share a good story.

Even if you’ve never written a story before, sharing something like a recipe or recipe book with your followers might seem like a good opportunity to share some insight on a popular food, recipe, or food culture topic.

As a result, sharing recipes and recipes that you use for your everyday meals can be an effective way to build a community around you.

It might seem strange at first, but

How to self-publish your own website, self-share social media

Google is now encouraging people to self publish their own websites using its self-sharing website wiki, which allows anyone to create an account.

The new self-Publishing tool allows anyone who is willing to pay a small fee to publish their website using their own code and logo, or on Google Docs, with a link to a self-uploaded PDF.

It’s an easy way to selfpublish on the internet and in the app.

“It’s great that self-published sites are now available on the Google Doc, so people can now share and share with others,” said Sam Whelan, head of Google Doc for Google Doc users.

“This is an important step forward for publishers who want to share content and create their own unique content.”

It’s also a good sign that Google is getting more and more involved in the self-expression of the internet.

“Google Docs is the place for sharing content, so it’s great to see Google now supporting the self publishing of content,” said David Deacon, general manager of self-hosted media at Google Doc.

“I like to think that with Google Doc you can publish your content to the world.”

Google also has plans to expand self-posts to YouTube and Twitter, and it recently announced that Google Drive will be open source and open to the public, allowing anyone to take control of their own files and upload content.

Self-publishing will be the next big trend in publishing as it allows people to do more with their own information and code.

“The self publishing will be a great addition to the self hosted publishing platform, because it allows anyone with a web browser to publish content, and with the Google self-service API, anyone can create and share content with the world,” said Deacon.

“Now people can have a blog and share it on their website and with other people.

That’s awesome.”

Google Doc will also allow you to embed self-post content into other apps and websites, and there will be more ways to share and promote your content.

“Self-pubbing will become more mainstream as we build the ecosystem around self-serving and shared content,” added Whelen.

“With self-posted content, we’re able to do things like embed YouTube videos, tweet them, or share content to Facebook.”

Google has already started supporting self-blogging, but it is not yet ready to support self-distribution, and has not set a date for that to happen.

“We are actively working on self-staging and self-publication,” said Whelian.

“For now, Google Doc is an excellent way to share your content with friends, colleagues, and fans.

However, we will explore how to support shared content as it becomes available.”

Self-Incrimination Is Just The Beginning: Self-Identity and the Perceived Threat of Violence

Self-incriminating behavior is a relatively new phenomenon in the American political landscape.

But in the past few decades, social media has provided a new outlet for many to share their thoughts about others, and self-identity has become an increasingly salient political issue.

While it is true that many people have expressed their thoughts on a range of topics, including racial profiling, sexual assault, and violence against women, the self-serving way in which those thoughts have been expressed has sparked a series of recent controversies and lawsuits that have exposed an alarming trend: that self-identified individuals, who have historically been largely marginalized and marginalized groups, are now being asked to defend their personal actions online.

As a result, the public is increasingly questioning the appropriateness of the self in the eyes of others, which in turn has led to a proliferation of self-reporting online.

A growing body of research indicates that the practice of self incrimination, or self-report, has the potential to undermine social trust.

In addition to its potential to influence the way we perceive and respond to others, it may also be used to manipulate individuals’ perceptions of themselves and their motives for participating in political discourse.

This article will examine the evolution of self reporting, the social implications of self sharing, and the impact of such actions on public trust.

In this article, I will examine how self-reports and self reporting can lead to a number of potentially harmful outcomes.

I will also consider how self reporting is now being used to legitimize the practice and influence the public.

The evolution of the public perception of selfIn the 1970s, the concept of self was defined by William James as “a kind of psychological personality profile, designed to distinguish persons by their character, habits, tastes, values, and dispositions, in the manner of a self-study or questionnaire.”

James had a clear point of view: the self is the collective product of the human psyche.

James believed that our personality, while imperfect, is a uniquely human product, one that can be studied by the use of scientific methods.

The idea of the personality was adopted by psychologists, psychologists were beginning to study personality traits, and people began to ask questions about the way their lives and beliefs were shaped by their psychological makeup.

These questions helped define the human experience.

It is true, there were plenty of studies that attempted to define a personality.

These were conducted by psychologists in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, who were trying to define personality traits and personality disorders, as well as their correlations with personality traits.

But in this time period, the research focused on individuals who were already identified as having a personality disorder.

So, for example, personality disorder diagnoses were often used to define people with autism, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia, as they were often thought to be “normal” and “normalcy-like.”

James believed that psychological research, and specifically the research of social psychology, could be used as a way to measure and understand people’s mental health.

James did not envision the concept that a person’s psychological makeup would be used in an attempt to manipulate or shape public opinion.

He envisioned the process of examining and understanding the psyche and its influence on behavior.

In other words, he envisioned a person who was psychologically healthy would be seen as more normal and a person with psychological disorders as more abnormal.

James was the father of modern psychological research and the father that psychologists sought to create the public image of their patients.

James recognized that the concept could also be useful in the context of public health, as the public often sees the psychological health of people who are mentally ill and not necessarily healthy.

This was the early period in which psychological research began to focus on the role of personality traits in determining how people behave and think.

The concept of personality was being developed and tested, and as it evolved, it became more refined and precise.

As time went on, the role and role of the concept in the public health system evolved.

Personality traits were used in the research that was being conducted to understand how to treat certain conditions.

And so, we now have a much more refined view of the ways that psychological characteristics influence behavior.

In the 1960s, there was a push by many researchers to examine the way that personality was connected to social attitudes.

For example, researchers in the 1950s and 1960s believed that a sense of social superiority could be related to a higher sense of self, which could be associated with higher levels of support for one’s own beliefs and practices.

This is also what is known as the “Pareto Principle.”

Pare to be precise, this is when two variables have a mean value and a standard deviation.

For instance, in an economic model, the mean value is the average price a consumer would pay for a given amount of goods. A

How to use self-replicating crypto-currency to increase social sharing and increase trust in your content

It is common to see self-reproducing cryptocurrencies being created for a variety of purposes.

The goal is to increase sharing and trust, and ultimately increase social capital.

Some cryptocurrencies are designed to be self-healing (such as Dash, Bitcoin), and others are designed as decentralized (such, Ethereum).

The most popular cryptocurrency of the bunch, Ethereum, uses blockchain technology to create a distributed ledger of transactions.

This allows the network to quickly validate and verify transactions, while also creating trust in the system.

The system is secure from attacks and theft by the parties involved.

While Ethereum has been popular in the cryptocurrency world, it is far from the only one.

A few years ago, many social media platforms took advantage of the blockchain technology.

Many sites started using the technology to provide an instant and free platform for people to share their thoughts and content.

While this technology has been around for years, the blockchain and cryptocurrencies have made a great leap forward in recent years.

As more and more people are embracing the blockchain, the potential is huge.

Today, you can read more about how to use the blockchain to create your own self-fulfilling prophesy.

How to increase your social sharing using self-renewable tokens article Self-reproduction is an important trend for cryptocurrency holders and investors.

When you invest in a cryptocurrency, you’re also investing in the blockchain.

The blockchain is the network that contains all the transactions on the network.

As the network grows, so too does the value of the coins.

The value of your investment depends on how many people and businesses can validate transactions.

The more people who are willing to trust and accept the blockchain as a whole, the greater the potential for a blockchain to become a currency.

There are a lot of different ways you can increase the social capital of your content.

How can you increase your Social Capital?

How can people interact with your content?

How do you earn social capital?

How long can you sustain it?

How does it affect your revenue?

The more you can create trust and trust in blockchain technology, the more people can interact with it.

To create trust in a blockchain, you need to create content that is trusted.

To be a credible, trusted, and trustworthy cryptocurrency, it needs to be created by people who want to trust it.

This is a big part of creating social capital in cryptocurrency.

You’ll also need to establish credibility, trust, integrity, and the ability to generate revenue through social media posts and advertising.

To build trust in an blockchain, it takes a lot more than just having a solid product.

In fact, it may take more than a simple website.

It may require creating an ecosystem of trusted content and a solid community.

This can include the creation of a platform to help people earn cryptocurrency through social sharing, and other services that can be used to help increase the value and popularity of the platform.

How do I increase my Social Capital with self-serving content?

What kinds of content should I create?

How will people interact?

How big can my platform be?

How much social capital will I need?

How is it distributed?

How secure is the system?

The social media platform is the only place that the blockchain can be verified, so it is very important to understand how it works.

When the blockchain is verified, you will see transactions being verified on the blockchain network.

You will see the transactions that have occurred on the platform and how the transactions were verified.

The network has to be as secure as possible, which means that transactions must not be broadcast to the network and be confirmed by the network before they can be processed.

The platform has to verify every transaction and verify them by checking the blockchain against other blockchain transactions.

There must also be a verification process for every transaction.

How many transactions will be validated per block?

How many people will be able to validate each transaction?

The blockchain has to contain transactions that are not broadcast to other blockchain networks, and it also has to have a verification system for verifying transactions on top of it.

How does the blockchain verify transactions?

How fast will transactions be validated?

When a transaction is verified on a blockchain network, the system will look up the transaction against the previous transactions that were confirmed on that network.

This gives the blockchain a record of how many transactions were confirmed and where those transactions were.

Once a transaction has been confirmed, it will be stored on the public blockchain for all to see.

When a block is confirmed, the transaction has to include a timestamp and the block number.

The timestamp is a unique number that the network will look for in the transaction, and when it finds one, it must include the block hash.

What happens when a transaction does not have a timestamp?

When the transaction is confirmed on the main blockchain, that means that it is not confirmed on any other blockchain.

This means that the transaction will be invalid.

The transaction is considered to be invalid on the

The social media giant wants to know why Twitter users are ‘sitting on’ fake news

Facebook has been working on ways to help make the social media platform a more transparent and accountable place to share news and information.

The company has been looking at ways to create a more accurate and meaningful feed of news on the platform.

Last week, Facebook introduced a new system called “feed filters,” which could allow users to filter out “fake news,” “misleading content,” “fakes and phishing” and “disinformation.”

But Facebook has had to come up with a way to make that information more accessible to people outside of its own community.

The new filters are part of the company’s broader effort to get its users to participate more in the way that they interact with Facebook, where they can make and share suggestions about news topics, as well as make and post comments.

Facebook has a lot of work to do before the company can offer a better way for people to participate in the feed.

“We want to make sure that people get the most relevant content they can find, and that’s what we’re trying to do with our filter,” CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in a Facebook Live video last week.

But Facebook is still working on a way for users to make their own suggestions about what the feed should show, and has already found that some of the recommendations aren’t very good.

“Some of the suggestions are so bad that they’re actually making our feed less relevant,” Zuckerberg said.

“They’re not getting the right content, they’re not engaging, they don’t get the engagement they’re looking for.”

Facebook has also been looking to improve its own newsfeed, but its recent efforts have only been partly successful.

In December, Facebook announced a new algorithm it calls News Feed Efficiency that it hopes will reduce the amount of spam it receives.

It says the new system will reduce spam by about a third.

But the company has also found that people who use the system tend to click on the same spam that Facebook has already removed from their feeds, rather than the spam that they think they should see.

And in January, Facebook was forced to apologize for removing a number of false accounts.

The problems that Facebook faces The problems it faces have come about as it has built its platform, but also as it expanded beyond its own communities and began to allow users and advertisers to reach new audiences.

It has also had to adjust its advertising platform in the past year, following a string of controversies about fake news and the content it hosts.

In July, Facebook’s chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, announced that the company would be cutting its ad revenue by 40 percent, saying that it had been “too reliant on Facebook ads for our growth.”

But Zuckerberg has also said that Facebook would not be changing its ads platform completely.

And he has defended Facebook’s decision to allow advertisers to target users who post “fake content” rather than real content.

“It’s not the right way to go about it,” Zuckerberg told Bloomberg last month.

“The right way is to have a more diverse audience and to be less dependent on Facebook.”

He said that ads will continue to be available on Facebook’s main page and other content on its mobile and desktop sites, as long as people do not create fake accounts and post spam.

“People are going to be able to reach a wider audience than ever before with these new tools,” Zuckerberg added.

But it’s not clear that Facebook’s current approach to ads and its decision to make ads available on the site will lead to more people sharing real content on the page.

Facebook did not respond to a request for comment.

Zuckerberg said that his team had spent the last year working to improve the way it processes user feedback, which is something that Facebook is very good at.

“What I’ve seen over the last few months, and the work that has been done in the last couple of months, is that we’ve been able to build a lot more trust between the user and the platform,” he said.

But as the platform has become more transparent, it has also become less open.

Facebook also recently took down its “Like” button, which allowed people to suggest and recommend friends to friends who were also liked by Facebook users.

Zuckerberg told investors that he was not going to remove the feature, but that the new features will make the platform more usable for people who do not have a lot to say.

“For the people who have a few things they’d like to say, we’re going to give them the ability to express them in a way that’s useful for them,” he told the crowd at a conference last month in Singapore.

“But the rest of us will continue using it to make the feed more accurate.”

Zuckerberg also talked about the company helping people in other industries and industries that don’t have the power to make a huge impact in a fast-moving world.

For example, he said that it is “totally possible” for the next Apple to

When self-serving media is good for journalism, what is self sharing?

When self serving media is bad for journalism — self-posts are a particularly egregious example of this — the result can be disastrous for the reputation of a publication, the reporter, or the public at large.

Self-posts have been shown to be both unethical and damaging to newsrooms, and are often a result of bias and dishonesty.

Here are five examples: Self-serving posts are bad for the credibility of newsrooms — they undermine the trust that newsrooms have in their own reporters.

Journalists often rely on a variety of sources, including the news media themselves, to help identify newsworthy issues.

If newsrooms believe their reporters are untrustworthy and biased, it makes it harder for them to publish accurate, unbiased stories.

In addition, if newsrooms find themselves at risk of losing their newsrooms due to self-posted articles, they are likely to be more cautious in reporting newsworthy stories.

Self posts are also a risk for the integrity of the newsrooms.

In some instances, journalists are more likely to publish self-reported news or other untruthful material that conflicts with the truth, such as false information or unsubstantiated claims.

When a newsroom is at risk for losing its newsroom, it is less likely to pursue the investigation necessary to confirm the truth of a story.

Self postings are a risk to journalism in general.

Journalists who self-post often rely too heavily on social media to make news.

When newsrooms are forced to rely on self-reports, they lose the trust of their readers.

For example, a news organization that relies on self posts to determine the accuracy of an article may not know the source or source of the information it’s reporting.

When reporters are exposed to self posts, they become less able to perform their jobs.

They are less able see what’s true, and their ability to identify and correct factual errors is limited.

This leads to more mistakes being made, and more mistakes that lead to more errors.

It’s not surprising, then, that self-reporting can lead to inaccuracies and misreporting.

For instance, when a story is self reported, there is often no need to ask a source for clarification or to verify information.

A recent study found that self reports can cause a greater than a 30 percent increase in the accuracy rate of stories published by news organizations.

However, if a reporter can identify the source of a self-report and correct the inaccuracy, the inaccerence will be corrected and the story will be published.

A newsroom’s reputation is also affected by how it self-represents its news.

The perception of the media can influence what the public perceives as newsworthy and what the media is willing to report.

A good example of self-presentation is the use of hashtags on Twitter, which can promote false news and distract from reporting the truth.

For journalists, self-publishing on social platforms can be a dangerous thing because they can be susceptible to misinformation and can be misconstrued.

This can be especially true when a news outlet uses self-published articles as a vehicle for promoting false information.

The use of self posts and hashtags in the newsroom can also lead to a reduction in the ability of the reporter to identify reliable sources.

When the reporter cannot identify a reliable source, the reporters reputation is in danger.

When journalists cannot identify reliable reporting sources, the reputation is not in danger, and the reporter can be promoted.

In this case, self reporting is a poor choice of communication.

The media has a responsibility to be as accurate as possible, and journalists have a duty to be accurate as well.

Journalists have a responsibility not to self report in order to create false news.

Self reporting can also undermine the credibility and independence of the press.

The reputation of the public has a direct impact on how trustworthy news outlets are and what they report.

For this reason, journalists should take care when they self report.

They should never self-impose a bias on the reporting process.

The fact that a news article is self reporting can have a detrimental impact on the credibility, independence, and reputation of journalists.

The impact of self reporting on journalism has been shown by numerous studies and studies that show that news organizations can be at greater risk of reputation erosion.

For the past 10 years, researchers at the University of British Columbia have been conducting a series of studies to explore the impact of reporting self-generated content on the reputation and credibility of media outlets.

The research is continuing and is expected to be published in the journal Journalism Ethics.

The study found evidence of a negative impact of news self-produced content on media reputation.

It found that journalists who self report more frequently tend to report stories that are more accurate, while journalists who report less often tend to avoid stories that were more inaccurate.

The researchers found that news self reported stories that had a more

When is self-sharing too self-indulgent?

The term self-share is used interchangeably with “sharing” or “sharing for others.”

But when you use the term “sharing,” it’s more like a public sharing of content on a site.

For example, if you’re sharing a photo, it’s your right to share it on a social media site.

Sharing to share is a great way to promote yourself, your business, or your community, but sharing for others isn’t.

When we use the word “sharing on a website,” we’re talking about the sharing of a photo or video or document that’s shared from a site to the web, such as Facebook or Twitter.

It’s also the sharing to share of content in an online magazine, website, or blog.

There are a number of social media sites and websites that can be used to share.

Here’s a list of them.

For a complete list of these sites and sites, see our full guide on how to find and sign up for a social networking site.

If you’re not sure which social networking sites are appropriate for you, check with a friend, family member, or professional network to get their guidance.

How to share content with other people.

In most cases, people can share content about themselves and their friends and family.

But sometimes people want to share their favorite recipes, travel itineraries, or personal health tips with friends and families.

To share your favorite content with friends, family, and colleagues, you need to be able to create an account on one of these social media websites.

To create an Instagram account, you’ll need to sign up through Instagram.

You’ll need a password, a photo you want to post, and a profile photo that shows you in your profile picture.

Once you’ve created an account, go to the “My Account” page.

Click the “Edit” link on the left side of the page.

Under “My Profile,” enter the username and password for your Instagram account.

If your username is your actual email address, click “Create.”

If you don’t have an email address and you’re signing up for an Instagram subscription, click the “Sign Up for a Membership” button at the top of the screen.

Enter the password for the account you want, and click “Save.”

You’ll be prompted to upload a photo.

Click “Upload” and your photo will be uploaded to your Instagram.

The photo is your personal photo.

To delete the photo, click on the “Delete Photo” button on the right side of your screen.

Your photo will disappear.

To upload new content, follow these steps: Select the photo you’d like to share, and then click “Upload.”

If the photo is too small or has other small details, click to zoom in.

You can also share it with your friends or family members using a photo-sharing service such as the Instagram photo-swap app.

If it’s too large, you can also upload the photo to other services.

Select the “Share” link at the bottom of the photo and then choose “Share via Email.”

Enter the email address for your email address (or your Facebook or Google+ name if you have one) and click the Upload button.

The Instagram app will ask you to verify your email and click OK.

Your photos will be sent to your email, and you’ll be notified when they’re ready to be shared.

For more tips on how and when to share your photos on social media, check out our guide on what to do when you’re in a hurry.

Sharing on a public social network.

Some people want the freedom to share more of their personal information, but they don’t want to be responsible for sharing it.

If they want to, they can share their personal info publicly, and they can make other people aware of the personal information they’re sharing with others.

The term “public social network” has come to mean an online community that shares and promotes news, photos, and videos, often with the goal of helping other people and sharing the benefits of sharing information about themselves.

Public social networks are where you can find other people’s content, share photos, or comment on other people posting content.

If a social network is too private for you or your family, you might want to find another service.

There’s no obligation for you to share personal information with others on your public social networks, but it’s a good idea to keep an eye out for signs of inappropriate content or behavior.

How public social networking services work.

You don’t need to have an Instagram app or account to use a public service, but you do need to register with the site to use it.

You do not need to set up an account to sign in, though you can do so if you don.

To use a private social network, you must register with that service.

This means that you have to set a password and password-protected accounts are required to use your account. When

후원 콘텐츠

우리카지노 - 【바카라사이트】카지노사이트인포,메리트카지노,샌즈카지노.바카라사이트인포는,2020년 최고의 우리카지노만추천합니다.카지노 바카라 007카지노,솔카지노,퍼스트카지노,코인카지노등 안전놀이터 먹튀없이 즐길수 있는카지노사이트인포에서 가입구폰 오링쿠폰 다양이벤트 진행.Best Online Casino » Play Online Blackjack, Free Slots, Roulette : Boe Casino.You can play the favorite 21 Casino,1xBet,7Bit Casino and Trada Casino for online casino game here, win real money! When you start playing with boecasino today, online casino games get trading and offers. Visit our website for more information and how to get different cash awards through our online casino platform.한국 NO.1 온라인카지노 사이트 추천 - 최고카지노.바카라사이트,카지노사이트,우리카지노,메리트카지노,샌즈카지노,솔레어카지노,파라오카지노,예스카지노,코인카지노,007카지노,퍼스트카지노,더나인카지노,바마카지노,포유카지노 및 에비앙카지노은 최고카지노 에서 권장합니다.온라인 카지노와 스포츠 베팅? 카지노 사이트를 통해 이 두 가지를 모두 최대한 활용하세요! 가장 최근의 승산이 있는 주요 스포츠는 라이브 실황 베팅과 놀라운 프로모션입니다.우리추천 메리트카지노,더킹카지노,파라오카지노,퍼스트카지노,코인카지노,샌즈카지노,예스카지노,다파벳(Dafabet),벳365(Bet365),비윈(Bwin),윌리엄힐(William Hill),원엑스벳(1XBET),베트웨이(Betway),패디 파워(Paddy Power)등 설명서.